Binding ultrawork mode directive for omo-senpi. When a prompt contains ultrawork or ulw, the omo input hook injects the full directive as a hidden custom message (customType omo-ultrawork:directive, display false) ahead of the user's text, which is left untouched; a prompt queued while the agent is streaming instead carries the directive appended inside that same message. The directive is present in the conversation context; on the idle path it is not shown in the visible prompt, while a queued prompt carries the directive visibly (exactly as before this change). When the directive is already present in the conversation, do not read this file again - this file is that same directive. Read this file only when ultrawork mode is requested and the directive is not already present in the conversation.
review-work
review-work is an open-source workflow skill for Claude Code and compatible agents, published by code-yeongyu. Its author describes it as: “Post-implementation review orchestrator. Launches 5 parallel background sub-agents: Oracle (goal/constraint verification), Oracle (code quality), Oracle (security), unspecified-high (hands-on QA execution), unspecifie…”. The project has 68k stars on GitHub and ships custom license terms, so review them before reuse. Add it to your setup with `git clone https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent ~/.claude/skills/review-work`.
What review-work does
This skill may include examples copied from the OpenCode harness. In Codex, do not call OpenCode-only tools such as `call_omo_agent(...)`, `task(...)`, `background_output(...)`, or `team_*(...)` literally. Translate those examples to Codex native tools:
Installation
Add review-work to your agent with:
git clone https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent ~/.claude/skills/review-workAlways review a skill's source before installing it. This command comes from the skill's public repository; the linked repo is the source of truth for exact setup steps.
What's inside
The SKILL.md for review-work is organised into these sections:
- Codex Harness Tool Compatibility
- Codex Subagent Reliability
- Phase 0: Gather Review Context
- Phase 1: Launch 5 Agents
- Agent 1: Goal & Constraint Verification (Oracle) - MAIN
- Agent 2: QA via App Execution (unspecified-high) - MAIN
- Agent 3: Code Quality Review (Oracle) - MAIN
- Agent 4: Security Review (Oracle) - SUB
- Agent 5: Context Mining (unspecified-high) - MAIN
- Phase 2: Wait & Collect
- Phase 3: Deliver Verdict
When to use it
Reach for review-work when you want workflow help from your agent without writing the same instructions every session. Load the skill and the agent picks it up automatically for relevant tasks.
Strengths
- Ships in code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent, an established project with 67,982 GitHub stars
- Actively maintained (recent commits)
Things to check
- No license declared — confirm terms with the author before reuse
Topics
Frequently asked questions
- What does review-work do?
- Post-implementation review orchestrator. Launches 5 parallel background sub-agents: Oracle (goal/constraint verification), Oracle (code quality), Oracle (security), unspecified-high (hands-on QA execution), unspecified-high (context mining from GitHub/git/Slack/Notion). All must pass for review to pass. MUST USE before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work. Triggers: 'review work', 'review my work', 'review changes', 'QA my work', 'verify implementation', 'check my work', 'validate changes', 'post-implementation review'.
- How do I install review-work?
- Run git clone https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent ~/.claude/skills/review-work in your agent, then reload your skills. Review the source at https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent before installing.
- Is review-work free to use?
- review-work is publicly available on GitHub, but code-yeongyu has not declared a standard open-source license (Other). Confirm the terms with the author before reusing it.
- Where does review-work come from?
- review-work ships inside code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent, a repository that contains 46 catalogued skills in total. The repository's 67,982 GitHub stars apply to that whole collection, not to this skill on its own.
Related skills
More Workflow →Goal-like loop that uses ultrawork mode to decompose work into systematic, evidence-bound steps.
Team-first maximum-saturation research orchestration for omo-senpi. Scopes solo, ALWAYS asks which final format to render (PDF+DOCX default), then stands up a max-size cooperating team (team_create): one member per axis plus skeptic/red-team members for ultradebate/hyperdebate cross-critique, explore/librarian lanes, live ulw-loop journaling, an EXPAND loop until leads run dry, claims proven by code or the claim-graph gate, and a cited synthesis with charts/Mermaid/assets behind visual-QA and `writing` proofread gates. ACTIVATES ONLY on an explicit user demand for research: the word 'ulw-research' ('/ulw-research', '$ulw-research'), any 'ulw' research wording, 'ultradebate' or 'hyperdebate' research requests, or an explicit request for research / deep research / an ultra-precise investigation, in any language. Never self-activates for ordinary questions, debugging, or implementation context-gathering. While active it overrides exploration-bounding defaults: exhaustive coverage is the goal.
Persistent Codex-style goal tracking for pi. Use when the user explicitly asks to set, continue, audit, pause, resume, complete, or inspect a long-running goal.
MUST USE when asked to find, read, list, search, inspect, fetch, export, or reconstruct coding-agent sessions across Codex, Claude Code/Desktop, OpenCode, OMO/Senpi/pi, oh-my-pi (omp), gajae-code (gjc), OpenClaw, Factory Droid, Amp, Gemini/Kimi/Qwen CLIs, Codebuff, Roo/Kilo/Cline, Kodu, Cursor CLI, Aider, Aside browser-agent sessions, or unknown local agent logs. Covers transcripts, session IDs, rollout JSONL, state SQLite, Claude projects/pre-compact histories, OpenCode messages/parts, child/subagent linkage, cwd/model/time/token filters, archives, and cost clues. Expands fuzzy recall into parallel query lanes and first probes known stores so absent platforms are skipped cheaply. Triggers: coding agent sessions, Codex/Claude/OpenCode/OMO/Senpi/pi/oh-my-pi/omp/gajae-code/gjc/OpenClaw/Droid/Amp/Kodu/Cursor/Aider/Aside sessions, transcript search, session history, session ID, read transcript, token usage, subagent sessions, what did I do yesterday, did we already do this.